Planet

In which countries is there no extradition?

Do you feel that you are being followed or pursued by dangerous individuals? Then you definitely need to find a safe place to live. But how do you choose a country with a stable system of law and order, where you will not be in danger?

First of all, you need to make sure that you are not extradited from this country. After all, your home country may ask for foreign citizenship to extradite you. Whether the grounds for extradition are fair is another question. However, not all countries sign extradition agreements, so they do not extradite suspects for legal or political reasons.

What is extradition?

Extradition is the formal process of transferring a person suspected or convicted of a criminal offence from one country to another for criminal prosecution or the enforcement of a court sentence.

Extradition is based on international treaties, conventions and bilateral agreements between states. It is a manifestation of the principle of international solidarity in the fight against crime and contributes to the inevitability of punishment. The extradition procedure is as follows:

  • The requesting State sends a formal request with detailed documents of identity and charges;
  • The requested State shall detain a person in its territory on the basis of an international warrant or request;
  • The local court assesses the legality of the request, verifies compliance with all legal norms;
  • The competent authorities decide whether to extradite or refuse extradition;
  • In case of a positive decision, the transfer of the person to the requesting state is organized.

Extradition treaties

Extradition treaties are international agreements between two or more countries that establish a legal framework and procedures for the transfer of persons from one jurisdiction to another for the purpose of criminal prosecution or enforcement of a court sentence.

Treaties establish clear rules and procedures to ensure the predictability and efficiency of the extradition process. They contribute to strengthening relations between states in the fight against crime.

The main legal aspects of extradition contracts
  • Dual criminality: the offence must be established as a crime in both the requesting and the requested State;
  • Specialty of extradition: a person can be prosecuted only for those crimes for which he was extradited;
  • Prohibition of extradition for political or military crimes: many States do not extradite persons for crimes of a political or military nature;
  • Respect for human rights: Extradition is not permitted if there is a risk of torture, inhuman treatment or the death penalty.

What are countries not subject to extradition?

Countries that are not subject to extradition are states that do not have extradition treaties. This means that they are not obliged to extradite persons to other states for criminal prosecution or enforcement of a court sentence.

Countries restrict extradition for the following reasons
  • Political conflicts or lack of diplomatic ties;
  • Protection of political refugees;
  • A ban on the extradition of own citizens;
  • Risk of inhuman treatment;
  • Lack of fair trial guarantees;
  • A desire to judge a person under national law.
The list of countries in which there is no extradition institution
  • Bahrain;
  • Venezuela;
  • Qatar;
  • Bhutan;
  • Kuwait;
  • China;
  • Cuba;
  • Israel;
  • Iran;
  • United Arab Emirates;
  • United Kingdom;
  • Solomon Islands;
  • Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic;
  • Saudi Arabia;
  • Free Kashmir;
  • North Korea;
  • Republic of Kosovo;
  • Russia;
  • Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus;
  • Oman;
  • Cook Islands.

However, it should be borne in mind that the absence of a treaty does not exclude the possibility of extradition. The transfer of accused or suspects is possible on the basis of individual agreements.

Countries without extradition treaties

Not all countries have signed international extradition treaties regulating the transfer of suspected or convicted persons from one state to another. This complicates the process of justice at the international level. But, on the other hand, for ordinary citizens, this is an opportunity to hide from danger and persecution.

The absence of extradition treaties is possible for the following reasons
  • Political isolation;
  • Limited diplomatic relations with other countries;
  • Political instability and lack of a centralized government;
  • Lack of an effective legal system;
  • Civil wars and military conflicts;
  • Autocratic regime;
  • Constitutional prohibitions;
  • Inconsistency of legal systems.
These countries include
  • China;
  • Saudi Arabia;
  • United Arab Emirates (UAE);
  • Iran;
  • Cuba;
  • North Korea;
  • Venezuela;
  • Oman;
  • Somalia;
  • Syria;
  • Yemen;
  • Eritrea;
  • Kuwait.

Countries with partial extradition

There are also states that practice partial extradition. Such countries agree to extradite another person for criminal prosecution or execution, but with certain limitations. Not all extradition requests are granted, and extradition is granted only within the established conditions.

Examples of countries with partial extradition:

  • Germany: does not extradite its own nationals, except for extradition to EU countries or the International Criminal Court;
  • France: demands guarantees against the use of the death penalty and respect for human rights;
  • Russia: does not extradite Russian citizens to foreign countries, tries its citizens for crimes committed abroad;
  • Brazil: does not extradite its nationals;
  • Mexico: Has a limited number of extradition agreements with other countries.
extradition law

Extradition laws in some countries

Each country at the level of national legislation can establish its own rules for regulating the extradition procedure.

Some countries (Germany and Brazil) prohibit the extradition of their citizens. Whereas the United States and Great Britain allow this under certain conditions. Many States refuse to extradite individuals for political offences, but the definition of such an offence may vary.

Differences between the continental and Anglo-Saxon legal systems also affect extradition proceedings. Participation in regional agreements simplifies and unifies the extradition process between the participating countries.

Next, we will consider the features of the extradition procedure in several leading countries.

Countries Not Subject to Extradition to the U.S.

U.S. extradition rules are governed by federal law (18 U.S.C. §3181-§3196) and numerous bilateral agreements with more than 100 countries.

U.S. law allows the extradition of its own citizens if it is provided for by the treaty. Exceptions may be made if there are humanitarian reasons or a risk of human rights violations.

If the requesting country provides for the death penalty, the United States can demand guarantees that it will not be applied. Refusal of extradition for political crimes. The U.S. routinely refuses extradition for political crimes, with the exception of terrorism and crimes against humanity.

The procedure for extradition to the United States is as follows
  1. The request is received by the Department of State;
  2. A federal judge determines whether the request meets national and international requirements;
  3. The final decision is made by the Department of State, taking into account diplomatic and humanitarian aspects.
The main countries that do not have an extradition agreement with the United States are
  • China;
  • Russia;
  • UAE;
  • Saudi Arabia;
  • Vietnam;
  • Kuwait;
  • Cuba;
  • Syria;
  • Iran;
  • Qatar;
  • North Korea;
  • Belarus;
  • Brunei;
  • Bahrain;
  • Montenegro;
  • Ukraine;
  • Moldova;
  • Tunisia;
  • Vanuatu;
  • Ecuador;
  • Ethiopia;
  • Cambodia;
  • Mongolia;
  • Uganda.

Countries not subject to extradition to the UK

Extradition proceedings in the UK are governed by the Extradition Act 2003. The Act divides countries into Part 1 (countries with a simplified procedure, formerly EU states) and Part 2 (the rest of the countries with which the UK has extradition treaties).

The law allows for the extradition of its own citizens. Assurances regarding conditions of detention and the judicial process may be requested.

After the UK left the EU, new cooperation agreements in the field of extradition were concluded with European countries. The trade and cooperation agreement between the EU and the UK includes extradition provisions replacing the European Arrest Warrant.

Extradition procedure in the UK
  1. Issuance of an arrest warrant (for Part 1 countries, a Simplified Arrest Warrant is used
  2. The person is detained on the basis of a warrant. Within 48 hours of arrest, a preliminary hearing must be held at Westminster Magistrates’ Court;
  3. The court examines the evidence presented and verifies the compliance of the procedure with legal norms. The grounds for extradition and possible reasons for refusal are assessed;
  4. The judge decides on the possibility of extradition. If approved, the case may be referred to the Home Secretary for final approval (for Part 2 countries);
  5. A person has the right to appeal the decision of the court to the High Court;
  6. Once all legal remedies had been exhausted, the defence or the Public Prosecutor’s Office could appeal to the Supreme Court.
The main countries without an extradition agreement with the UK are
  • China;
  • UAE;
  • Kuwait;
  • Vietnam;
  • Saudi Arabia;
  • Qatar;
  • Mongolia;
  • Bahrain;
  • North Korea;
  • Somalia;
  • Afghanistan;
  • Syria;
  • Algeria;
  • Libya;
  • Iraq.

These countries have either never entered into an agreement with the UK or have political or legal restrictions that prevent extradition.

Countries not subject to extradition to Australia

The rules governing the extradition of persons are governed by the Extradition Act 1988. Australia also has bilateral agreements and is a party to multilateral conventions.

The court does not assess the guilt or innocence of a person, but only checks the sufficiency of evidence for possible trial in the requesting country (prima facie principle). The Attorney-General may refuse extradition on humanitarian grounds, including a person’s health or family circumstances.

Features of the extradition procedure in Australia
  1. A foreign country sends a formal request for extradition to Australia through diplomatic channels;
  2. The request is reviewed by the Australian Attorney General, who assesses its compliance with legal requirements;
  3. The Attorney-General issues an arrest warrant and the person is detained by Australian law enforcement agencies;
  4. The Magistrate’s Court holds a hearing to determine whether the extradition is in accordance with the legal grounds;
  5. The Attorney-General takes the final decision on the extradition of a person, taking into account political and humanitarian considerations;
  6. A person has the right to appeal the decision of the court and the Attorney-General to the Federal Court or the High Court of Australia.
Countries that do not have an extradition agreement with Australia
  • China;
  • Russia;
  • UAE;
  • Saudi Arabia;
  • Iran;
  • Kuwait;
  • North Korea;
  • Bahrain;
  • Syria;
  • Vietnam;
  • Malaysia;
  • Indonesia;
  • Iraq.

Countries not subject to extradition to India

The Extradition Act, 1962 is the principal piece of legislation governing the extradition process in India. India has extradition treaties and agreements with more than 40 countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and others. India was extraditing its nationals on the condition that all human rights were respected.

Features of the extradition procedure in India
  1. Sending an extradition request through official diplomatic channels;
  2. The request is referred to the Ministry of Home Affairs of India;
  3. The Ministry of the Interior assesses the request for compliance with the requirements of the Extradition Act and the treaties in force. The grounds for extradition, the existence of double criminalization and compliance with legal procedures are checked;
  4. If the request is deemed admissible, the case shall be referred to the appropriate court for an extradition hearing;
  5. The judge shall decide on the possibility of extradition on the basis of the facts presented and the applicable law;
  6. The Minister of the Interior takes the final decision on extradition;
  7. A person subject to extradition has the right to appeal the decision to higher tribunals, including the High Court and the Supreme Court of India.
Countries that do not have an extradition agreement with India
  • China;
  • UAE;
  • Saudi Arabia;
  • Malaysia;
  • Thailand;
  • Indonesia;
  • Iran;
  • Nepal;
  • Myanmar;
  • Oman;
  • North Korea;
  • Bahrain;
  • Afghanistan;
  • Iran.

If you need legal advice on extradition issues, our international law lawyers are ready to provide professional assistance.

Extradition process in the UK

The extradition process in the UK begins with a formal request from another state. The UK cooperates with many countries on the basis of bilateral and multilateral agreements, such as the European Convention on Extradition or agreements with third countries.

If the country is part of the European Union (pre-Brexit), extradition was carried out through the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). Since Brexit, the UK has entered into bilateral agreements with various countries to settle extradition issues.

The Home Office assesses the request for formalities. The availability of the necessary documentation and information is checked.

The High Court or the Magistrates’ Court will then issue a warrant for the person’s arrest. The National Crime Agency can be involved in the execution of the warrant.

The main part of the extradition process takes place in the Magistrate’s Court. At this stage, the court decides on the following issues:

  • Whether there is sufficient evidence for extradition;
  • Whether extradition violates the rights of the person, in particular the right to a fair trial;
  • Is the extradition politically motivated?

If the court grants the request, it refers the case to the Minister of the Interior, who makes the final decision. He has 2 months to make a decision.

Both parties have the right to appeal:

  • in the High Court;
  • In exceptional cases, the Supreme Court.

An appeal must be filed within 14 days of the decision.

If, after considering all appeals, the courts uphold the decision to extradite, the Minister of the Interior issues an extradition order. The person is transferred to the country that sent the request, in accordance with the conditions provided for by international agreements.

Countries subject to expatriation and not subject to extradition

Expatriation is a process in which a person voluntarily leaves their country of citizenship or permanent residence in order to live and work in another state for a long time. People who go through this process are called expats.

Expatriation is a voluntary process in which a person renounces their citizenship or permanent residence and moves to another country. Expatriates usually do this for personal or professional reasons: seeking better economic opportunities, education, or quality of life. Extradition is carried out for the purpose of bringing a person to criminal responsibility or executing a court sentence.

Legal aspects of expatriation
  • Visa and immigration requirements for legal residence and employment in another country;
  • Tax requirements, including double taxation;
  • Labor requirements, contracting, minimum wage, working hours, vacation and other legal issues;
  • Social security, health insurance and pension contributions.
The main countries that are chosen for expatriation
  • Russia: The Constitution of the Russian Federation prohibits the extradition of Russian citizens to other states. Therefore, the country does not extradite its citizens, even if there are international requests;
  • China: restricts the extradition of its nationals and has a small number of extradition treaties;
  • Cuba: no extradition agreements with the United States and many other countries;
  • Iran: does not have extradition treaties with many countries;
  • Taiwan: does not have mechanisms for cooperation with international extradition bodies due to its partial recognition;
  • UAE: protects foreigners from extradition, especially for highly professional persons or businessmen.
non-extradition countries

How are INTERPOL Red Notices used for extradition?

An INTERPOL Red Notice is a formal request from one country’s law enforcement agencies to the international community requesting:

  • Establish the location of the wanted person;
  • To detain or arrest a person for the purpose of further extradition.

Red Notice is not an international arrest warrant, but practically performs a similar function, contributing to the rapid informing of law enforcement agencies about wanted persons.

The main functions of the red notification:

  1. Identification and apprehension of persons through rapid messaging;
  2. Grounds for provisional arrest pending receipt of a formal extradition request;
  3. Identification of wanted persons through detailed information about them;
  4. Networking and exchange of information between countries.

Not all countries are required to detain individuals on the basis of a Red Notice if it is contrary to their legislation. After detention, a long period may pass before the actual extradition through judicial procedures.

Looking for legal advice?

Extradition issues are linked to different legal systems, international treaties and have serious implications for human life. If you or your loved ones are facing this problem, it is crucial to get professional legal help.

Our team of qualified attorneys and has significant experience in protecting the rights of clients, so we are ready to provide comprehensive support at every stage of the process: from risk assessment to representation in court. The specialist will prepare an effective defense strategy and represent your interests in court.

Do not postpone the solution of important legal issues. Contact our experts today for professional help protecting your rights.

Planet